Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKaplan, Todd R.en_GB
dc.contributor.authorZamir, Shmuelen_GB
dc.contributor.departmentUniversity of Exeter; Hebrew Universityen_GB
dc.date.accessioned2008-06-04T11:29:05Zen_GB
dc.date.accessioned2011-01-25T10:25:36Zen_GB
dc.date.accessioned2013-03-19T15:51:33Z
dc.date.issued2002-02en_GB
dc.description.abstractWe formulate a way to study whether the asymmetry of buyers (in the sense of having different prior probability distributions of valuations) is helpful to the seller in private-value auctions (asked first by Cantillon [2001]). In our proposed formulation, this question corresponds to two important questions previously asked: Does a first-price auction have higher revenue than a second-price auction when buyers have asymmetric distributions (asked by Maskin and Riley [2000])? And does a seller enhance revenue by releasing information (asked by Milgrom and Weber[1982])? This is shown by constructing two Harsanyi games of incomplete information each having the same ex-ante distribution of valuations but in one beliefs are symmetric while in the other beliefs are sometimes asymmetric. Our main result is that answers to all three questions coincide when values are independent and are related when values are affiliated.en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.2139/ssrn.300401en_GB
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10036/29471en_GB
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherSSRNen_GB
dc.relation.urlhttp://ssrn.com/abstract=300401en_GB
dc.subjectAsymmetric auctionsen_GB
dc.subjectAsymmetric beliefsen_GB
dc.subjectAffiliationen_GB
dc.subjectLinkage principleen_GB
dc.titleA note on revenue effects of asymmetry in private-value auctionsen_GB
dc.typeWorking Paperen_GB
dc.date.available2008-06-04T11:29:05Zen_GB
dc.date.available2011-01-25T10:25:36Zen_GB
dc.date.available2013-03-19T15:51:33Z
dc.identifier.issn15565068en_GB
dc.identifier.journalSSRN Electronic Journalen_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record