| dc.contributor.author | Eichberger, Jürgen | en_GB |
| dc.contributor.author | Kelsey, David | en_GB |
| dc.contributor.department | University of Heidelberg; University of Exeter | en_GB |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2008-06-18T11:14:09Z | en_GB |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2011-01-25T10:25:28Z | en_GB |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2013-03-19T15:51:24Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2006-11 | en_GB |
| dc.description.abstract | This paper considers the impact of ambiguity in strategic situations. It extends the
earlier literature by allowing for optimistic responses to ambiguity. Ambiguity is modelled
by CEU preferences. We study comparative statics of changes in ambiguity-attitude in
games with strategic complements or substitutes. This gives a precise statement of the
impact of ambiguity on economic behaviour. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10036/30135 | en_GB |
| dc.language.iso | en | en_GB |
| dc.publisher | University of Exeter, School of Business and Economics | en_GB |
| dc.relation.url | http://hdl.handle.net/10871/16729 | |
| dc.subject | Ambiguity in games | en_GB |
| dc.subject | Support | en_GB |
| dc.subject | Optimism | en_GB |
| dc.subject | Strategic complementarity | en_GB |
| dc.title | Optimism and pessimism in games (working paper) | en_GB |
| dc.type | Working Paper | en_GB |
| dc.date.available | 2008-06-18T11:14:09Z | en_GB |
| dc.date.available | 2011-01-25T10:25:28Z | en_GB |
| dc.date.available | 2013-03-19T15:51:24Z | |
| dc.description | working paper | en_GB |
| dc.description | The journal article version is available in ORE: http://hdl.handle.net/10871/16729 | |
