Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMelkonyan, Tigranen_GB
dc.contributor.authorPingle, Marken_GB
dc.date.accessioned2013-02-19T11:17:18Zen_GB
dc.date.accessioned2013-03-19T15:58:38Z
dc.date.issued2009-07-08en_GB
dc.description.abstractUsing a subclass of the α-maximin expected-utility preference model, in which the decision maker’s degree of ambiguity and degree of pessimism are each parameterized, we present a theory of religious choice in the Pascalian decision theory tradition, one that can resolve dilemmas, address the “many Gods objection,” and address the ambiguity inherent in religious choice. Parameterizing both the degree of ambiguity and the degree of pessimism allows one to examine how the two interact to impact choice, which is useful regardless of the application. Applying this model to religious choice is a move beyond subjective expected-utility theory, allowing us to show that a change in either the degree of ambiguity or the degree of pessimism can lead a decision maker to “convert” from one religion to another.en_GB
dc.identifier.citationVol. 69, Issue 3, pp. 417 - 438en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s11238-009-9164-0en_GB
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10036/4325en_GB
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherSpringeren_GB
dc.subjectchoice of religionen_GB
dc.subjectα-maximin expected utilityen_GB
dc.titleAmbiguity, pessimism, and rational religious choiceen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2013-02-19T11:17:18Zen_GB
dc.date.available2013-03-19T15:58:38Z
dc.identifier.issn0040-5833en_GB
dc.identifier.journalTheory and Decisionen_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record