Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorWragg, Teden_GB
dc.contributor.authorHaynes, Gillen_GB
dc.contributor.authorChamberlin, Rosemaryen_GB
dc.contributor.authorWragg, Carolineen_GB
dc.contributor.departmentUniversity of Exeteren_GB
dc.date.accessioned2009-01-06T17:04:59Zen_GB
dc.date.accessioned2011-01-25T11:51:41Zen_GB
dc.date.accessioned2013-03-20T16:41:06Z
dc.date.issued2003-04en_GB
dc.description.abstractThis is the first of two papers describing a study of the introduction of performance-related pay into the teaching profession in the UK. It reports the views and experiences of a national random sample of 1,000 primary and secondary head teachers in over 150 local education authorities in England who were responsible for implementing one strand of the government's performance-related pay scheme, Threshold Assessment. The second paper describes the views and experiences of teachers who were unsuccessful in crossing the threshold and therefore did not obtain a pay increment. Head teachers did not find it difficult to assess the five standards that teachers had to meet in order to receive their 2,000 additional performance payment, but they were very critical of the training they received, the amount of time they had to spend, and the changing ground rules. The success rate was 86% of all teachers eligible, but 97% of those who actually applied were awarded the additional payment. Most heads dealt with the applications entirely on their own, though one in six, mainly in the secondary sector, shared the task with senior colleagues. Unsuccessful candidates were few in number, but most were deemed to be failing on more than one aspect of their teaching. While those who were successful in crossing the threshold were pleased and relieved, unsuccessful applicants were said to be bitter, threatening action, in several cases leaving the school. External Threshold Assessors had to visit every school. In only 71 cases out of 19,183 applicants in our sample of schools was there disagreement. Three-quarters of heads felt Threshold Assessment had made a little or no difference to what teachers did in the classroom. This is confirmed by our other studies, which suggest that teachers simply keep more careful records, rather than change how they teach. Some 60% of heads were opposed to performance-related pay, but 39% were in favour of it in principle, though most of these were unhappy about the way it had been put into practice.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipThe Teachers' Incentive Pay Project (TIPP) is funded by the Leverhulme Trust.en_GB
dc.identifier.citation18(1), pp.3-23en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/0267152032000048550en_GB
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10036/47117en_GB
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherRoutledgeen_GB
dc.relation.urlhttp://www.informaworld.com/smpp/content~content=a738552772~db=all~order=pageen_GB
dc.subjectperformance-related payen_GB
dc.subjectteachersen_GB
dc.subjectThreshold Assessmenten_GB
dc.titlePerformance-related pay: the views and experiences of 1,000 primary and secondary head teachersen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2009-01-06T17:04:59Zen_GB
dc.date.available2011-01-25T11:51:41Zen_GB
dc.date.available2013-03-20T16:41:06Z
dc.identifier.issn0267-1522en_GB
dc.descriptionThis is a postprint of an article whose final and definitive form has been published in Research Papers in Education© 2003 Copyright Taylor & Francis; Research Papers in Education is available online at http://www.informaworld.comen_GB
dc.identifier.eissn1470-1146en_GB
dc.identifier.journalResearch Papers in Educationen_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record