Does university research improve university teaching in management?

DSpace/Manakin Repository

Open Research Exeter (ORE)

Does university research improve university teaching in management?

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author James, Simon en_GB
dc.contributor.department University of Exeter en_GB
dc.date.accessioned 2009-01-15T16:56:02Z en_GB
dc.date.accessioned 2011-01-25T10:25:46Z en_US
dc.date.accessioned 2013-03-19T15:54:13Z
dc.date.issued 2005 en_GB
dc.description.abstract It seems widely accepted, not least by academics, that university research improves university teaching. However, it is not always clear how important the links are. In the UK a huge amount of detailed information has become available as a result of two extensive exercises undertaken to measure the quality of research and teaching – the Research Assessment Exercise (RAE) and the work of the government Quality Assurance Agency (QAA). The RAE was primarily set up to provide the basis on which public funds for research could be allocated by government funding bodies though it is now used more generally as an indicator of the quality of research in university departments. The QAA's mission is to safeguard the public interest in sound standards of higher education qualifications. The result of their work has generated a natural experiment in which universities departments strove to achieve the best results they could for their research and teaching. During 2000/2001 university departments including those in Business and Management were assessed by the QAA and in 2001 the results of the most recent RAE assessment of university research performance were also published. This paper reviews the two exercises and then undertakes some preliminary analysis of the results for departments of Business and Management and also, as a comparison, for Economics departments. On the basis of the evidence so far, it does not seem that high quality research as defined by the RAE has a very large and measurable benefit on the quality of teaching. However, the analysis of teaching quality and research outcomes using chi-square indicates that the results for Economics are significant at the 10 per cent level but not at the 5 per cent level. For Business and Management there is no statistically significant association between higher scores in the RAE and higher scores in the QAA reviews. Such a result may have arisen for one or more of a range of reasons. One plausible possibility is that the range and nature of the research that helps the delivery of excellent teaching in Business and Management is not the same as it is in Economics. en_GB
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10036/47559 en_GB
dc.language.iso en en_GB
dc.publisher University of Exeter en_GB
dc.relation.ispartofseries Discussion Papers in Management en_GB
dc.relation.ispartofseries 05/01 en_GB
dc.relation.url http://business-school.exeter.ac.uk/research/management/discussion_papers/ en_GB
dc.subject teaching en_GB
dc.subject Research assessment en_GB
dc.subject Management en_GB
dc.subject University en_GB
dc.title Does university research improve university teaching in management? en_GB
dc.type Meetings and Proceedings en_GB
dc.date.available 2009-01-15T16:56:02Z en_GB
dc.date.available 2011-01-25T10:25:46Z en_US
dc.date.available 2013-03-19T15:54:13Z
dc.identifier.issn 1472-2939 en_GB
dc.description Paper presented at British Academy of Management conference, University of Oxford, 13-15 September 2005 en_GB


Files in this item

Files Size Format View
0501.pdf 215.5Kb PDF Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Browse

My Account

Local Links