dc.contributor.author | Wynn, Mark | en_GB |
dc.contributor.department | University of Exeter | en_GB |
dc.date.accessioned | 2009-02-06T13:57:21Z | en_GB |
dc.date.accessioned | 2011-01-25T11:45:06Z | en_GB |
dc.date.accessioned | 2013-03-20T14:18:34Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2006-09 | en_GB |
dc.description.abstract | In his paper ‘Theism and the philosophy of nature’, Ben Cordry argues that theism's conception of nature has been falsified. In this response, I argue that the universe in many ways conforms to theistic expectations, and that there is no presumption that a divinely ordered world will take the form that Cordry proposes. | en_GB |
dc.identifier.citation | 42(3), pp.291-297 | en_GB |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1017/S0034412506008456 | en_GB |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10036/48598 | en_GB |
dc.language.iso | en | en_GB |
dc.publisher | Cambridge University Press | en_GB |
dc.relation.url | http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayAbstract?fromPage=online&aid=452734&fulltextType=RA&fileId=S0034412506008456 | en_GB |
dc.relation.url | http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayIssue?jid=RES&volumeId=42&issueId=03&iid=452718 | en_GB |
dc.subject | theism | en_GB |
dc.subject | nature | en_GB |
dc.subject | intelligent design theory | en_GB |
dc.subject | Christianity | en_GB |
dc.subject | theology | en_GB |
dc.subject | cosmology | en_GB |
dc.title | A response to Cordry on design | en_GB |
dc.type | Article | en_GB |
dc.date.available | 2009-02-06T13:57:21Z | en_GB |
dc.date.available | 2011-01-25T11:45:06Z | en_GB |
dc.date.available | 2013-03-20T14:18:34Z | |
dc.identifier.issn | 0034-4125 | en_GB |
pubs.declined | 2012-12-03T13:35:32.0+0000 | |
dc.description | © 2006 Cambridge University Press | en_GB |
dc.identifier.eissn | 1469-901X | en_GB |
dc.identifier.journal | Religious Studies | en_GB |