Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorWynn, Marken_GB
dc.contributor.departmentUniversity of Exeteren_GB
dc.date.accessioned2009-02-06T13:57:21Zen_GB
dc.date.accessioned2011-01-25T11:45:06Zen_GB
dc.date.accessioned2013-03-20T14:18:34Z
dc.date.issued2006-09en_GB
dc.description.abstractIn his paper ‘Theism and the philosophy of nature’, Ben Cordry argues that theism's conception of nature has been falsified. In this response, I argue that the universe in many ways conforms to theistic expectations, and that there is no presumption that a divinely ordered world will take the form that Cordry proposes.en_GB
dc.identifier.citation42(3), pp.291-297en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.1017/S0034412506008456en_GB
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10036/48598en_GB
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherCambridge University Pressen_GB
dc.relation.urlhttp://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayAbstract?fromPage=online&aid=452734&fulltextType=RA&fileId=S0034412506008456en_GB
dc.relation.urlhttp://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayIssue?jid=RES&volumeId=42&issueId=03&iid=452718en_GB
dc.subjecttheismen_GB
dc.subjectnatureen_GB
dc.subjectintelligent design theoryen_GB
dc.subjectChristianityen_GB
dc.subjecttheologyen_GB
dc.subjectcosmologyen_GB
dc.titleA response to Cordry on designen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2009-02-06T13:57:21Zen_GB
dc.date.available2011-01-25T11:45:06Zen_GB
dc.date.available2013-03-20T14:18:34Z
dc.identifier.issn0034-4125en_GB
pubs.declined2012-12-03T13:35:32.0+0000
dc.description© 2006 Cambridge University Pressen_GB
dc.identifier.eissn1469-901Xen_GB
dc.identifier.journalReligious Studiesen_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record