| dc.contributor.author | Tettenborn, Andrew | en_GB |
| dc.contributor.department | University of Exeter | en_GB |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2009-02-06T15:35:38Z | en_GB |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2011-01-25T11:52:58Z | en_GB |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2013-03-20T16:56:07Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2004-11-01 | en_GB |
| dc.description.abstract | This article explores the English approach to punitive damages. It begins with a brief history of punitive damages in England and a look at where punitive damages are going in the country. Then, the author discusses the criteria for an award and the possibility of punitive damages for break of contract. Other aspects of punitive damages in England explored in the Article include public defendants, liability, judge and jury and the size of punitive awards. | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Vol, 141 (4), pp. 1551-1573 | en_GB |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10036/48618 | en_GB |
| dc.language.iso | en | en_GB |
| dc.publisher | San Diego Law School | en_GB |
| dc.relation.url | https://digital.sandiego.edu/sdlr/vol41/iss4/9/ | |
| dc.subject | punitive damages | en_GB |
| dc.subject | English law | en_GB |
| dc.title | Punitive damages - a view from England | en_GB |
| dc.type | Article | en_GB |
| dc.date.available | 2009-02-06T15:35:38Z | en_GB |
| dc.date.available | 2011-01-25T11:52:58Z | en_GB |
| dc.date.available | 2013-03-20T16:56:07Z | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 0036-4037 | |
| dc.description | Author's draft of paper given at a conference in Louisville, Kentucky,
in 2003 on which the article is based. Full text available from Digital USD, the repository of the University of San Diego, via the link in this record | en_GB |
| dc.identifier.journal | San Diego Law Review | en_GB |
