The foundations of Godwinian impartiality

DSpace/Manakin Repository

Open Research Exeter (ORE)

The foundations of Godwinian impartiality

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:


Title: The foundations of Godwinian impartiality
Author: Lamb, Robert
Citation: 18(2), pp.134-153
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Journal: Utilitas
Date Issued: 2006-06
DOI: 10.1017/S0953820806001890
Abstract: William Godwin is often cited in contemporary philosophical discussions of ethical impartiality, within which he functions as a sort of shorthand for a particularly crude and extreme act-utilitarianism, one that contains no foundational commitments other than the maximizing of some conception of the general good. This article offers a reinterpretation of Godwin's argument, by focusing closely on the ambiguous nature of its justificatory foundations. Although utilitarian political theories seem to have two possible justifications available to them – egalitarian and teleological – there has been little effort to establish which one of them Godwin's argument for impartiality relies on. This problem becomes more complicated when it is acknowledged that Godwin actually provides two different justifications for impartiality, only one of which is consequentialist. The other seems to make a case based on the recognition of moral worth and virtue. This is something confirmed through analysis of Godwin's writings on equality and suggests his political theory is more complex than most philosophers are willing to admit.
Type: Article
Description: © 2006 Cambridge University Press
Keywords: Godwin, Williamutilitarianismimpartialityequality
ISSN: 0953-8208

Please note: Before reusing this item please check the rights under which it has been made available. Some items are restricted to non-commercial use. Please cite the published version where applicable.

Files in this item

Files Size Format View
LambUtilitas06.pdf 113.0Kb PDF Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)


My Account

Local Links