Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLamb, Roberten_GB
dc.contributor.departmentUniversity of Exeteren_GB
dc.date.accessioned2009-02-20T09:40:11Zen_GB
dc.date.accessioned2011-01-25T11:43:52Zen_GB
dc.date.accessioned2013-03-20T16:31:03Z
dc.date.issued2006-06en_GB
dc.description.abstractWilliam Godwin is often cited in contemporary philosophical discussions of ethical impartiality, within which he functions as a sort of shorthand for a particularly crude and extreme act-utilitarianism, one that contains no foundational commitments other than the maximizing of some conception of the general good. This article offers a reinterpretation of Godwin's argument, by focusing closely on the ambiguous nature of its justificatory foundations. Although utilitarian political theories seem to have two possible justifications available to them – egalitarian and teleological – there has been little effort to establish which one of them Godwin's argument for impartiality relies on. This problem becomes more complicated when it is acknowledged that Godwin actually provides two different justifications for impartiality, only one of which is consequentialist. The other seems to make a case based on the recognition of moral worth and virtue. This is something confirmed through analysis of Godwin's writings on equality and suggests his political theory is more complex than most philosophers are willing to admit.en_GB
dc.identifier.citation18(2), pp.134-153en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.1017/S0953820806001890en_GB
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10036/49694en_GB
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherCambridge University Pressen_GB
dc.relation.urlhttp://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayIssue?jid=UTI&volumeId=18&issueId=02&iid=439658en_GB
dc.relation.urlhttp://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayAbstract?fromPage=online&aid=439663&fulltextType=RA&fileId=S0953820806001890en_GB
dc.subjectGodwin, Williamen_GB
dc.subjectutilitarianismen_GB
dc.subjectimpartialityen_GB
dc.subjectequalityen_GB
dc.titleThe foundations of Godwinian impartialityen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2009-02-20T09:40:11Zen_GB
dc.date.available2011-01-25T11:43:52Zen_GB
dc.date.available2013-03-20T16:31:03Z
dc.identifier.issn0953-8208en_GB
dc.description© 2006 Cambridge University Pressen_GB
dc.identifier.eissn1741-6183en_GB
dc.identifier.journalUtilitasen_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record