The Nature of the Motor Insurers’ Bureau and its Agreements: Time for a Radical New Approach?
Channon, M
Date: 22 June 2020
Journal
European Journal of Comparative Law and Governance
Publisher
Brill Academic Publishers
Publisher DOI
Abstract
The Motor Insurers’ Bureau (MIB) was formed in 1946 to provide compensation for victims of road
traffic accidents from uninsured drivers and later untraced drivers.
1 The MIB and its agreements have
been criticised by academics due to potential gaps in coverage.2 The MIB agreements are seen as ‘an
entirely novel piece of extra-statutory ...
The Motor Insurers’ Bureau (MIB) was formed in 1946 to provide compensation for victims of road
traffic accidents from uninsured drivers and later untraced drivers.
1 The MIB and its agreements have
been criticised by academics due to potential gaps in coverage.2 The MIB agreements are seen as ‘an
entirely novel piece of extra-statutory machinery’,3 due to not being based in statute and therefore
without parliamentary control. This has brought challenges involving issues of transparency when new
agreements are created. Claims against the MIB, particularly in relation to untraced drivers, have also
been controversial. With the UK in a transition period in terms of its relationship with the EU and with
the potential absence of a cause of action against the MIB post-transition agreement, the question arises
as to whether the MIB should be put on a statutory footing.
This article therefore aims to explore whether the MIB should be put on a statutory footing. It will
examine the relationships between the MIB, its members, the state, and Parliament. It will further
examine issues involving transparency and enforcement. It will go on to compare the Australian Capital
Territory (ACT) approach in legislation with the United Kingdom (UK) approach, to see what will be
gained or lost with the UK adopting the legislative route. It will then conclude on which, if any, examine
potential reform options – radical or otherwise - might be usefully pursued to meet the criticisms of to
the system in the UK.
Law School
Faculty of Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences
Item views 0
Full item downloads 0
Except where otherwise noted, this item's licence is described as © Matthew Channon, 2019.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the prevailing CC-BY License.