This article explores the relationship between the Greeks, Macedonians and Romans
through the prism of Polybius of Megalopolis and his Histories in the second century BC. It
throws light on how a Greek might control and construct the image of larger powers to explain
political change and assert or deny them political and cultural ...
This article explores the relationship between the Greeks, Macedonians and Romans
through the prism of Polybius of Megalopolis and his Histories in the second century BC. It
throws light on how a Greek might control and construct the image of larger powers to explain
political change and assert or deny them political and cultural legitimacy, while at the same time
proclaiming the continued importance of Hellenic culture. It investigates Polybius’ construction
and use of Hellenism in his Histories and demonstrates how he deliberately interchanged the
trajectories of Macedon and Rome to offer an ideological explanation for Rome’s rise and
Macedon’s fall, to assert that the preservation of the Greeks lay with Rome not Macedon, to
protect the standing of the Achaean League, and to emphasise the importance of Hellenic virtues
for success on the domestic and international scenes.
