Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorCavaliere, G
dc.contributor.authorRahbek, A
dc.date.accessioned2020-04-02T10:36:48Z
dc.date.issued2020-03-20
dc.description.abstractIn this article, we discuss the bootstrap as a tool for statistical inference in econometric time series models. Importantly, in the context of testing, properties of the bootstrap under the null (size) as well as under the alternative (power) are discussed. Although properties under the alternative are crucial to ensure the consistency of bootstrap-based tests, it is often the case in the literature that only validity under the null is discussed. We provide new results on bootstrap inference for the class of double-autoregressive (DAR) models. In addition, we review key examples from the bootstrap time series literature in order to emphasize the importance of properly defining and analyzing the bootstrap generating process and associated bootstrap statistics, while also providing an up-to-date review of existing approaches. DAR models are particularly interesting for bootstrap inference: first, standard asymptotic inference is usually difficult to implement due to the presence of nuisance parameters; second, inference involves testing whether one or more parameters are on the boundary of the parameter space; third, even second-order moments may not exist. In most of these cases, the bootstrap is not considered an appropriate tool for inference. Conversely, and taking testing nonstationarity to illustrate, we show that although a standard bootstrap based on unrestricted parameter estimation is invalid, a correct implementation of the bootstrap based on restricted parameter estimation (restricted bootstrap) is first-order valid. That is, it is able to replicate, under the null hypothesis, the correct limiting distribution. Importantly, we also show that the behavior of this bootstrap under the alternative hypothesis may be more involved because of possible lack of finite second-order moments of the bootstrap innovations. This feature makes for some parameter configurations, the restricted bootstrap unable to replicate the null asymptotic distribution when the null is false. We show that this possible drawback can be fixed by using a novel bootstrap in this framework. For this “hybrid bootstrap,” the parameter estimates used to construct the bootstrap data are obtained with the null imposed, while the bootstrap innovations are sampled with replacement from unrestricted residuals. We show that the hybrid bootstrap mimics the correct asymptotic null distribution, irrespective of the null being true or false. Monte Carlo simulations illustrate the behavior of both the restricted and the hybrid bootstrap, and we find that both perform very well even for small sample sizes.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipDanish Council for Independent Researchen_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipUniversity of Bolognaen_GB
dc.identifier.citationPublished online 20 March 2020en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.1017/s0266466620000067
dc.identifier.grantnumber7015-00028en_GB
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/120515
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherCambridge University Press (CUP)en_GB
dc.rights© Cambridge University Press 2020en_GB
dc.titleA primer on bootstrap testing of hypotheses in time series models: with an application to double autoregressive modelsen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2020-04-02T10:36:48Z
dc.identifier.issn0266-4666
dc.descriptionThis is the author accepted manuscript. The final version is available from Cambridge University Press via the DOI in this recorden_GB
dc.identifier.journalEconometric Theoryen_GB
dc.rights.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserveden_GB
rioxxterms.versionAMen_GB
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2020-03-20
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_GB
refterms.dateFCD2020-04-02T10:34:47Z
refterms.versionFCDAM
refterms.dateFOA2020-04-02T10:36:55Z
refterms.panelCen_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record