Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGainsbury, AN
dc.contributor.authorFenton, RA
dc.contributor.authorJones, CA
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-04T08:19:03Z
dc.date.issued2020-05-13
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: Violence against women and girls is a public health epidemic. Campus-based research has found bystander programmes show promise as effective primary prevention of sexual violence. However, evidence regarding domestic violence and abuse bystander prevention specifically, and in community settings generally, is still in development. Further, research has predominantly emanated from the US. Examining proof of concept in differing cultural contexts is required. This study evaluates the feasibility and potential for effectiveness of a domestic violence and abuse bystander intervention within UK general communities-Active Bystander Communities. METHODS: Participants recruited opportunistically attended a three-session programme facilitated by experts in the field. Programme feasibility was measured using participant attendance and feedback across nine learning objectives. Myth acceptance, bystander efficacy, behavioural intent and bystander behaviours were assessed using validated scales at baseline, post-intervention, and four-month follow-up. Results were examined for potential backlash. Analyses used a paired sample t-test and effect size was quantified with Cohen's d. RESULTS: 58/70 participants attended all programme sessions. Participant feedback consistently rated the programme highly and significant change (p ≤ 0·001) was observed in the desired direction across behavioural intent, bystander efficacy, and myth acceptance scores at post and follow-up. Effect size was generally large and, with the exception of Perception of Peer Myth Acceptance, improved at follow-up. Backlash was minimal. CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge this is the first UK-based study to examine the potential of bystander intervention as a community-level intervention for domestic violence and abuse. Findings are promising and indicate the translatability of the bystander approach to domestic violence and abuse prevention as well as community contexts. This is likely to be of great interest to policymakers and may help shape future community-based interventions. Further research is now needed using experimental designs engaging diverse community audiences.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipBristol City Councilen_GB
dc.identifier.citationVol. 20, 674en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s12889-020-08519-6
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/121274
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherBMCen_GB
dc.rightsOpen Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.en_GB
dc.subjectBystanderen_GB
dc.subjectCommunityen_GB
dc.subjectDomestic violence and abuseen_GB
dc.subjectInterpersonal violenceen_GB
dc.subjectPreventionen_GB
dc.subjectViolence against women and girlsen_GB
dc.titleFrom campus to communities: evaluation of the first UK-based bystander programme for the prevention of domestic violence and abuse in general communitiesen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2020-06-04T08:19:03Z
dc.identifier.issn1471-2458
dc.descriptionThis is the final version. Available from the publisher via the DOI in this record.en_GB
dc.descriptionThe datasets used during the current study are available from the corresponding author under reasonable request.en_GB
dc.identifier.journalBMC public healthen_GB
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_GB
dcterms.dateAccepted2020-03-12
exeter.funder::Bristol City Councilen_GB
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_GB
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2020-05-13
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_GB
refterms.dateFCD2020-06-04T08:16:54Z
refterms.versionFCDVoR
refterms.dateFOA2020-06-04T08:19:07Z
refterms.panelCen_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
Except where otherwise noted, this item's licence is described as Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.