Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBoyle, C
dc.contributor.authorAnderson, J
dc.date.accessioned2020-07-10T13:12:27Z
dc.date.issued2020-09-03
dc.description.abstractThis article discusses the justification for inclusive education in Australia, whilst being cognisant of the wider international landscape. Separate educational provision is increasing in many countries including Australia. Inclusive education has plateaued to a degree with demand increasing for non-inclusive settings. There are three main components to the argument for and against inclusive education and these are the educational, social, and the economic justification. The authors find that there is clear evidence that inclusive education in Australia can be justified across these areas. There is a dearth of evidence that inclusive education is less than beneficial for all students in mainstream schools. In fact, studies show that there is an economic advantage to being fully inclusive but this should not be seen as an opportunity for cost saving in the education sector but the proper deployment of resources to ensure effective education for all students no matter their background. The evidence for social and educational benefits is vast with both parents and students reporting positive outcomes. Inclusive education can be fraught with difficulties but this article clearly shows the positive justification for inclusive educational environments.en_GB
dc.identifier.citationPublished online 3 September 2020en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s11125-020-09494-x
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/121889
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherSpringer Verlag / UNESCOen_GB
dc.rights© The Author(s) 2020. Open Access. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
dc.subjectinclusive educationen_GB
dc.subjectjustificationen_GB
dc.subjectAustraliaen_GB
dc.subjecteducational inequalityen_GB
dc.titleThe justification for inclusive education in Australiaen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2020-07-10T13:12:27Z
dc.identifier.issn0033-1538
dc.descriptionThis is the final version. Available on open access from Springer Verlag via the DOI in this recorden_GB
dc.identifier.eissn1573-9090
dc.identifier.journalProspectsen_GB
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_GB
dcterms.dateAccepted2020-07-09
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_GB
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2020-07-09
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_GB
refterms.dateFCD2020-07-10T12:18:27Z
refterms.versionFCDAM
refterms.dateFOA2020-09-25T09:28:55Z
refterms.panelCen_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

© The Author(s) 2020. Open Access. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License,
which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long
as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article
are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the
material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not
permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly
from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
Except where otherwise noted, this item's licence is described as © The Author(s) 2020. Open Access. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.