Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLee, J
dc.contributor.authorBao, Y
dc.date.accessioned2020-08-13T10:47:32Z
dc.date.issued2020-12-03
dc.description.abstractThe paper discusses how asset managers are regulated in the UK in order to provide investor protection and market confidence. Fiduciary duties and the duty of care in the English common law, statutory laws, the rules of the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), and other industry codes are examined to provide an explanation of the UK regulatory approach to the asset management industry. The paper then discusses the extent to which a legal transplant of the UK model to China may be feasible as the asset management industry is currently being reformed in China. Recommendations are made for China to develop an independent asset management industry, to provide more investment outlets for investors, and to have effective enforcement mechanisms of laws and rules to deliver market confidence and investor protection.en_GB
dc.identifier.citationPublished online 3 December 2020en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/1023263X20958375
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/122450
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherSAGE Publicationsen_GB
dc.rights© The Author(s) 2020. Open access. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
dc.subjectasset managementen_GB
dc.subjectfiduciary dutyen_GB
dc.subjectinvestor protectionen_GB
dc.subjectshadow-bankingen_GB
dc.subjectChinaen_GB
dc.subjectUS-China Trade Waren_GB
dc.titlePrivate law and public regulation for investor protection in the asset management industry: aims and practices of transposing the UK model in Chinaen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2020-08-13T10:47:32Z
dc.identifier.issn1023-263X
dc.descriptionThis is the final version. Available on open access from SAGE Publications via the DOI in this recorden_GB
dc.identifier.journalMaastricht Journal of European and Comparative Lawen_GB
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_GB
dcterms.dateAccepted2020-08-13
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_GB
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2020-08-13
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_GB
refterms.dateFCD2020-08-13T09:43:33Z
refterms.versionFCDAM
refterms.dateFOA2021-01-14T15:13:32Z
refterms.panelCen_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

© The Author(s) 2020. Open access. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
Except where otherwise noted, this item's licence is described as © The Author(s) 2020. Open access. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).