Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSynge, M
dc.date.accessioned2020-12-01T11:15:01Z
dc.date.issued2021-01-25
dc.description.abstractMost universities (bar profit-making institutions) are charities as a matter of law but, historically, have been exempt from charity law regulation. This paper considers the statutory reforms of 2006, which sought to level the regulatory playing field by appointing ‘Principal Regulators’ of such ‘exempt charities’ to promote compliance with charity law. Focusing on the university sector – where some universities are now registered charities (and regulated by the Charity Commission) whilst others remain exempt – it will note how the reforms have resulted in the application of significantly different degrees of scrutiny and accountability, both between individual universities and between universities and other charities. In part, this is due to the statutory framework itself but, significantly, is also attributable to the radically different approach taken by the Office for Students, which replaced HEFCE as Principal Regulator in 2018. Possible improvements in regulatory practice and statutory reform are offered.
dc.identifier.citationPublished online 25 January 2021en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.1017/lst.2020.39
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/123854
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherSociety of Legal Scholars / Cambridge University Press (CUP)en_GB
dc.rights© The Author(s), 2021. This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
dc.subjectcharity law
dc.subjectproperty and trusts
dc.subjectuniversities
dc.subjectOffice for Students
dc.subjectexempt charities
dc.subjectregulation
dc.titleRegulation of universities as charities: one step forward, two steps backen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2020-12-01T11:15:01Z
dc.identifier.issn0261-3875
dc.descriptionThis is the final version. Available on open access from Cambridge University Press via the DOI in this recorden_GB
dc.identifier.journalLegal Studiesen_GB
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_GB
dcterms.dateAccepted2020-11-10
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_GB
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2020-11-10
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_GB
refterms.dateFCD2020-12-01T10:35:23Z
refterms.versionFCDAM
refterms.dateFOA2021-03-12T11:50:49Z
refterms.panelCen_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

© The Author(s), 2021.
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Except where otherwise noted, this item's licence is described as © The Author(s), 2021. This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.