Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorCollier, SM
dc.contributor.authorGreen, SM
dc.contributor.authorInman, A
dc.contributor.authorHopkins, DW
dc.contributor.authorKendall, H
dc.contributor.authorJahn, MM
dc.contributor.authorDungait, JAJ
dc.date.accessioned2021-02-25T09:33:05Z
dc.date.issued2020-10-02
dc.description.abstractThere are few reliable data sets to inspire confidence in policymakers that soil organic carbon (SOC) can be measured on farms. We worked with farmers in the Tamar Valley region of southwest England to select sampling sites under similar conditions (soil type, aspect and slope) and management types. Topsoils (2–15 cm) were sampled in autumn 2015, and percentage soil organic matter (%SOM) was determined by loss on ignition and used to calculate %SOC. We also used the stability of macroaggregates in cold water (WSA) (‘soil slaking’) as a measure of ‘soil health’ and investigated its relationship with SOC in the clay-rich soils. %SOM was significantly different between management types in the order woodland (11.1%) = permanent pasture (9.5%) > ley-arable rotation (7.7%) = arable (7.3%). This related directly to SOC stocks that were larger in fields under permanent pasture and woodland compared with those under arable or ley-arable rotation whether corrected for clay content (F = 8.500, p <.0001) or not (F = 8.516, p <.0001). WSA scores were strongly correlated with SOC content whether corrected for clay content (SOCadj R2 =.571, p <.0001) or not (SOCunadj R2 = 0.490, p =.002). Time since tillage controlled SOC stocks and WSA scores, accounting for 75.5% and 51.3% of the total variation, respectively. We conclude that (1) SOC can be reliably measured in farmed soils using accepted protocols and related to land management and (2) WSA scores can be rapidly measured in clay soils and related to SOC stocks and soil management.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipBiotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC)en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipNational Institute of Food and Agriculture, U.S. Department of Agricultureen_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipGlobal Farm Platformen_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipWestcountry Rivers Trusten_GB
dc.identifier.citationVol. 37 (1), pp. 49 - 62en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/sum.12658
dc.identifier.grantnumberBBS/E/C/00005214en_GB
dc.identifier.grantnumber2013‐68002‐20525en_GB
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/124910
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherWiley / British Society of Soil Scienceen_GB
dc.rights.embargoreasonUnder embargo until 2 October 2021 in compliance with publisher policyen_GB
dc.rights© 2020 British Society of Soil Scienceen_GB
dc.subjectaggregate stabilityen_GB
dc.subjectagricultureen_GB
dc.subjectcarbon sequestrationen_GB
dc.subjectmanagement typeen_GB
dc.subjectsoil healthen_GB
dc.subjecttillageen_GB
dc.titleEffect of farm management on topsoil organic carbon and aggregate stability in water: A case study from Southwest England, UKen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2021-02-25T09:33:05Z
dc.identifier.issn0266-0032
dc.descriptionThis is the author accepted manuscript. The final version is available from Wiley via the DOI in this recorden_GB
dc.identifier.journalSoil Use and Managementen_GB
dc.rights.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserveden_GB
dcterms.dateAccepted2020-09-23
exeter.funder::WWF UKen_GB
rioxxterms.versionAMen_GB
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2020-10-02
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_GB
refterms.dateFCD2021-02-25T09:30:16Z
refterms.versionFCDAM
refterms.panelCen_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record