| dc.contributor.author | Southgate, C | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-04-20T06:49:38Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2021-04-19 | |
| dc.description.abstract | This article comments briefly on the current state of the science-religion debate before exploring three areas on which (it is claimed) it should now be focused: the COVID pandemic, humans’ relationship with other animals, and the global climate emergency. In each case the article comments on recent work and makes connections with longer-established themes in the debate. | en_GB |
| dc.identifier.citation | Vol. 62 (2), pp. 112-123 | en_GB |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.3828/mb.2021.8 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10871/125402 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | en_GB |
| dc.publisher | Liverpool University Press | en_GB |
| dc.rights.embargoreason | Under embargo until 19 October 2021 in compliance with publisher policy. | en_GB |
| dc.rights | © 2021 Liverpool University Press | en_GB |
| dc.subject | Science-religion debate | en_GB |
| dc.subject | covid | en_GB |
| dc.subject | divine action | en_GB |
| dc.subject | animals | en_GB |
| dc.subject | vegetarianism | en_GB |
| dc.subject | climate change | en_GB |
| dc.subject | hope | en_GB |
| dc.title | Enough of Galileo and the Huxley-Wilberforce Debate: Science and Theology in the Climate Emergency | en_GB |
| dc.type | Article | en_GB |
| dc.date.available | 2021-04-20T06:49:38Z | |
| dc.description | This is the author accepted manuscript. The final version is available from Liverpool University Press via the DOI in this record. | en_GB |
| dc.identifier.journal | Modern Believing | en_GB |
| dc.rights.uri | http://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved | en_GB |
| dcterms.dateAccepted | 2020-11-20 | |
| rioxxterms.version | AM | en_GB |
| rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate | 2020-11-20 | |
| rioxxterms.type | Journal Article/Review | en_GB |
| refterms.dateFCD | 2021-04-19T16:16:51Z | |
| refterms.versionFCD | AM | |
| refterms.dateFOA | 2021-10-18T23:00:00Z | |
| refterms.panel | D | en_GB |
