The concept of relation and the explanation of the phenomenon of Entanglement
dc.contributor.author | Stella, A | |
dc.contributor.author | Cantalupi, T | |
dc.contributor.author | Ianulardo, G | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-02-14T14:29:06Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2022-02-12 | |
dc.date.updated | 2022-02-14T12:21:18Z | |
dc.description.abstract | We investigate from a philosophical point of view the concept of relation that is used to explain the physical phenomenon of Entanglement. If the concept of relation is understood in the ordinary sense of the mono-dyadic construct, which requires a middle term between the two extremes, it is aporetic and, thus, incapable of explaining the phenomenon. To the contrary, we propose to think the relation as the act of self-referring of related terms, which is unique and identical for both terms. In the unity of this act, the duality of terms disappears, so that the authentic unity is obtained. Moving from this concept of unity, the phenomenon of Entanglement becomes intelligible, since the two particles emerge as the two abstract sections of a unique reality. | en_GB |
dc.identifier.citation | Published online 12 February 2022 | en_GB |
dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.1111/phin.12344 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10871/128807 | |
dc.identifier | ORCID: 0000-0002-2286-4817 (Ianulardo, Giancarlo) | |
dc.language.iso | en | en_GB |
dc.publisher | Wiley | en_GB |
dc.rights | © 2022 The Authors. Philosophical Investigations published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. | en_GB |
dc.title | The concept of relation and the explanation of the phenomenon of Entanglement | en_GB |
dc.type | Article | en_GB |
dc.date.available | 2022-02-14T14:29:06Z | |
dc.identifier.issn | 0190-0536 | |
dc.description | This is the final version. Available on open access from Wiley via the DOI in this record | en_GB |
dc.identifier.eissn | 1467-9205 | |
dc.identifier.journal | Philosophical Investigations | en_GB |
dc.relation.ispartof | Philosophical Investigations | |
dc.rights.uri | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ | en_GB |
dcterms.dateAccepted | 2022 | |
rioxxterms.version | VoR | en_GB |
rioxxterms.type | Journal Article/Review | en_GB |
refterms.dateFCD | 2022-02-14T14:13:06Z | |
refterms.versionFCD | VoR | |
refterms.dateFOA | 2022-02-14T14:29:23Z | |
refterms.panel | C | en_GB |
refterms.dateFirstOnline | 2022-02-12 |
Files in this item
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
Except where otherwise noted, this item's licence is described as © 2022 The Authors. Philosophical Investigations published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.