Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorQuintana-Domeque, C
dc.contributor.authorProto, E
dc.date.accessioned2022-02-22T14:27:11Z
dc.date.issued2022-02-15
dc.date.updated2022-02-22T14:14:04Z
dc.description.abstractWe use longitudinal data from a representative sample of the UK and compare self-reported mental health, as measured by the GHQ-12 score, at three timepoints (2017–2019, April 2020 and March 2021), for the whole sample and by sex and ethnicity. Out of the 14,382 individuals interviewed in 2017–2019 and April 2020, 10,445 were interviewed again in March 2021. The mean GHQ-12 in April 2020 is 12.37 [95% CI: 12.22, 12.52] and in March 2021 is 12.36 [95% CI: 12.21, 12.51], above that of 2017–2019: 11.13 [95% CI: 10.99, 11.26]. We do not find evidence that the level of mental health goes back to pre-pandemic levels. In terms of inequalities, while the gender gap (mean difference between women and men) in mental health deterioration among White British is closing, there is no clear evidence that the ethnic gap (mean difference between ethnic minorities and White British) among men is changing.en_GB
dc.identifier.citationPublished online 15 February 2022en_GB
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1515/bejeap-2021-0394
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/128867
dc.identifierORCID: 0000-0002-6626-6261 (Quintana-Domeque, Climent)
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherDe Gruyteren_GB
dc.relation.urlhttps://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/YUOWJEen_GB
dc.rights©2022 Climent Quintana-Domeque and Eugenio Proto, published by De Gruyter. Open access This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.en_GB
dc.subjectanxietyen_GB
dc.subjectdepressionen_GB
dc.subjectgenderen_GB
dc.subjectethnicityen_GB
dc.subjectCOVID-19en_GB
dc.subjectinequalitiesen_GB
dc.titleOn the Persistence of Mental Health Deterioration during the COVID-19 Pandemic by Sex and Ethnicity in the UK: Evidence from Understanding Societyen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2022-02-22T14:27:11Z
dc.identifier.issn2194-6108
dc.descriptionThis is the final version. Available on open access from De Gruyter via the DOI in this recorden_GB
dc.descriptionData and code availability: The research data are distributed by the UK Data Service. Researchers who would like to use Understanding Society need to register with the UK Data Service before being allowed to apply for or download datasets. More information: https://www.understandingsociety.ac.uk/documentation/access-data. The code to replicate the analysis in this letter is publicly available from the Harvard Dataverse repository: https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/YUOWJEen_GB
dc.identifier.eissn1935-1682
dc.identifier.journalB.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policyen_GB
dc.relation.ispartofThe B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, 0(0)
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_GB
dcterms.dateAccepted2022-02-01
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_GB
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2022-02-15
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_GB
refterms.dateFCD2022-02-22T14:24:08Z
refterms.versionFCDVoR
refterms.dateFOA2022-02-22T14:27:21Z
refterms.panelCen_GB
refterms.dateFirstOnline2022-02-15


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

©2022 Climent Quintana-Domeque and Eugenio Proto, published by De Gruyter. Open access
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Except where otherwise noted, this item's licence is described as ©2022 Climent Quintana-Domeque and Eugenio Proto, published by De Gruyter. Open access This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.