Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorCavaliere, G
dc.contributor.authorLu, Y
dc.contributor.authorRahbek, A
dc.contributor.authorStærk-Østergaard, J
dc.date.accessioned2022-04-11T11:26:12Z
dc.date.issued2022-03-30
dc.date.updated2022-04-11T11:03:23Z
dc.description.abstractInference and testing in general point process models such as the Hawkes model is predominantly based on asymptotic approximations for likelihood-based estimators and tests. As an alternative, and to improve finite sample performance, this paper considers bootstrap-based inference for interval estimation and testing. Specifically, for a wide class of point process models we consider a novel bootstrap scheme labeled ‘fixed intensity bootstrap’ (FIB), where the conditional intensity is kept fixed across bootstrap repetitions. The FIB, which is very simple to implement and fast in practice, extends previous ideas from the bootstrap literature on time series in discrete time, where the so-called ‘fixed design’ and ‘fixed volatility’ bootstrap schemes have shown to be particularly useful and effective. We compare the FIB with the classic recursive bootstrap, which is here labeled ‘recursive intensity bootstrap’ (RIB). In RIB algorithms, the intensity is stochastic in the bootstrap world and implementation of the bootstrap is more involved, due to its sequential structure. For both bootstrap schemes, we provide new bootstrap (asymptotic) theory which allows to assess bootstrap validity, and propose a ‘non-parametric’ approach based on resampling time-changed transformations of the original waiting times. We also establish the link between the proposed bootstraps for point process models and the related autoregressive conditional duration (ACD) models. Lastly, we show effectiveness of the different bootstrap schemes in finite samples through a set of detailed Monte Carlo experiments, and provide applications to both financial data and social media data to illustrate the proposed methodology.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipDanish Council for Independent Researchen_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipBubble Studies, Denmarken_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipUniversity of Copenhagenen_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipItalian Ministry of University and Researchen_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipUniversity of Sydneyen_GB
dc.identifier.citationPublished online 30 March 2022en_GB
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2022.02.006
dc.identifier.grantnumber015-00028Ben_GB
dc.identifier.grantnumber2017TA7TYCen_GB
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/129342
dc.identifierORCID: 0000-0002-2856-0005 (Cavaliere, Giuseppe)
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherElsevieren_GB
dc.rights.embargoreasonUnder embargo until 30 March 2024 in compliance with publisher policyen_GB
dc.rights© 2022 Elsevier B.V. This version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/  en_GB
dc.subjectSelf-exciting point processesen_GB
dc.subjectConditional intensityen_GB
dc.subjectBootstrap inferenceen_GB
dc.subjectHawkes processen_GB
dc.subjectAutoregressive conditional duration modelsen_GB
dc.titleBootstrap inference for Hawkes and general point processesen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2022-04-11T11:26:12Z
dc.identifier.issn0304-4076
dc.descriptionThis is the author accepted manuscript. The final version is available from Elsevier via the DOI in this recorden_GB
dc.identifier.journalJournal of Econometricsen_GB
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Econometrics
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/  en_GB
dcterms.dateAccepted2022-02-24
rioxxterms.versionAMen_GB
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2022-03-30
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_GB
refterms.dateFCD2022-04-11T11:21:58Z
refterms.versionFCDAM
refterms.panelCen_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

© 2022 Elsevier B.V. This version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/  
Except where otherwise noted, this item's licence is described as © 2022 Elsevier B.V. This version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/