Justice for the blackest malefactors? Determinate prison sentences, early release, and the ECHR
dc.contributor.author | Edwards, RA | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-06-10T15:07:50Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2022-03-09 | |
dc.date.updated | 2022-06-10T13:48:38Z | |
dc.description.abstract | In the light of the High Court's decision in R (Khan) v Secretary of State for Justice [2020] 1 WLR 3932 this paper contends that a revised approach to the interpretation of Articles 5 and 7 of the European Convention on Human Rights is needed. The paper argues that the Article 5 ECHR right to liberty and security plays a developing, though overlooked, role in the context of regulating determinate prison sentences. English law's conclusion that Article 5 of the ECHR has little to offer in this context is wrong and needs to be reconsidered. Equally, a more generous interpretation of Article 7 of the ECHR is now required: an approach which reflects the reality of determinate sentences. | en_GB |
dc.format.extent | 1-20 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Published online 9 March 2022 | en_GB |
dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.1017/lst.2022.1 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10871/129905 | |
dc.identifier | ORCID: 0000-0002-0234-8268 (Edwards, Richard A) | |
dc.language.iso | en | en_GB |
dc.publisher | Cambridge University Press | en_GB |
dc.rights | © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Society of Legal Scholars. This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited. | en_GB |
dc.subject | human rights law | en_GB |
dc.subject | right to liberty and security | en_GB |
dc.subject | prison sentences | en_GB |
dc.title | Justice for the blackest malefactors? Determinate prison sentences, early release, and the ECHR | en_GB |
dc.type | Article | en_GB |
dc.date.available | 2022-06-10T15:07:50Z | |
dc.identifier.issn | 0261-3875 | |
exeter.article-number | PII S0261387522000010 | |
dc.description | This is the final version. Available from Cambridge University Press via the DOI in this record. | en_GB |
dc.identifier.eissn | 1748-121X | |
dc.identifier.journal | Legal Studies | en_GB |
dc.relation.ispartof | Legal Studies | |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | en_GB |
dcterms.dateAccepted | 2022-01-03 | |
rioxxterms.version | VoR | en_GB |
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate | 2022-03-09 | |
rioxxterms.type | Journal Article/Review | en_GB |
refterms.dateFCD | 2022-06-10T15:05:11Z | |
refterms.versionFCD | VoR | |
refterms.dateFOA | 2022-06-10T15:10:34Z | |
refterms.panel | C | en_GB |
refterms.dateFirstOnline | 2022-03-09 |
Files in this item
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
Except where otherwise noted, this item's licence is described as © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Society of Legal Scholars. This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.