Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorCaunedo, J
dc.contributor.authorKeller, E
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-27T15:09:28Z
dc.date.issued2022-04-30
dc.date.updated2022-06-27T14:35:41Z
dc.description.abstractTechnical change shifts the relative importance of certain economic activities over others, effectively determining the incidence of barriers to the transition of workers across occupations on output and inequality. To what extent has technical change mitigated or exacerbated the incidence of these barriers? To answer this question we study the link between occupation-specific labor market barriers, as measured in Hsieh et al. (2019), and capital-embodied technical change (CETC), as measured in Caunedo et al. (2021). We find that CETC mitigated the incidence of labor market barriers on output per worker by 9.1%, in the US between 1984 and 2014. A forecasting exercise over the next 10 years suggests that if the path of CETC follows the one observed during the previous 10 years, the gender wage gap should widen by 0.12p.p. per year and the race wage gap should widen by 0.07p.p. per year. The reason is that female and black workers face higher barriers in occupations where CETC rises wages the most. In addition, the model also predicts that absent mitigation policies, the skill-premium should rise at 0.24p.p. per year, twice as fast as the observed change in the last 10 years of our sample.en_GB
dc.format.extent65-88
dc.identifier.citationVol. 129, pp. 65-88en_GB
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmoneco.2022.04.006
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/130076
dc.identifierORCID: 0000-0001-7443-183X (Keller, Elisa)
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherElsevieren_GB
dc.relation.urlhttps://capitalbyoccupation.weebly.comen_GB
dc.rights.embargoreasonUnder embargo until 30 April 2024 in compliance with publisher policyen_GB
dc.rights© 2022 Elsevier B.V. This version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/  en_GB
dc.subjectCapital-embodied technical changeen_GB
dc.subjectMisallocationen_GB
dc.subjectInequalityen_GB
dc.titleTechnical change and the demand for talenten_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2022-06-27T15:09:28Z
dc.identifier.issn0304-3932
dc.descriptionThis is the author accepted manuscript. The final version is available from Elsevier via the DOI in this recorden_GB
dc.descriptionData availability: The dataset, for aggregated stocks at 3-digit and 1-digit occupational classification, is available for download at https://capitalbyoccupation.weebly.comen_GB
dc.identifier.journalJournal of Monetary Economicsen_GB
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Monetary Economics, 129
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/  en_GB
dcterms.dateAccepted2022-04-25
rioxxterms.versionAMen_GB
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2022-04-30
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_GB
refterms.dateFCD2022-06-27T15:06:55Z
refterms.versionFCDAM
refterms.dateFOA2024-04-29T23:00:00Z
refterms.panelCen_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

© 2022 Elsevier B.V. This version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/  
Except where otherwise noted, this item's licence is described as © 2022 Elsevier B.V. This version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/