Analysis of the regional environmental performance of mining corporations through the examination of the Corporate Sustainability Reports
Diaz Del Olmo Oliveira, MA
Date: 22 August 2022
Publisher
University of Exeter
Degree Title
Master of Science by Research in Mining and Mineral Engineering
Abstract
This research makes empirical contributions toward analysing the environmental performance of mining companies and environmental legal enforcement across regions. A total of 98 Corporate Sustainability Reports from ten mining corporations issued between 2010 and 2019 were examined to collect qualitative
and quantitative data about ...
This research makes empirical contributions toward analysing the environmental performance of mining companies and environmental legal enforcement across regions. A total of 98 Corporate Sustainability Reports from ten mining corporations issued between 2010 and 2019 were examined to collect qualitative
and quantitative data about environmental incidents and environmental legal compliance (in terms of monetary sanctions). The salient findings of this research were three:
Low environmental performance was recognised in developing mining-rich regions (Africa and South America), compared with developed regions such as
North America, Australia, and Europe, given that developing regions accumulated the highest number of environmental incidents. Most of the environmental incidents were triggered by rainwater, and the main components affected were land and water.
Prolonged periods (of more than ten years in some cases) to issue a fine to mining companies after the occurrence of an environmental incident were detected. The enforcement capacity of mining-rich governments remains primarily poor. Only a small percentage of environmental incidents resulted in
fines by environmental agencies in the countries where these mining companies operate.
Finally, most of the Sustainability Reports issued by mining companies contain complex and incomplete information, which results in difficulty in usage or comparison. Inter-company and inter-year reporting variations were noticed in the structure and content, selective information was likely to be disclosed for the
environmental non-compliance (monetary sanctions) indicator, and the information provided was complicated to evaluate properly when qualitative data was not robust for the environmental incidents indicator. The participation of stakeholders is likely vital in making transparency effective around environmental reporting and preventing the illusion of transparency (zombie transparency) in the Sustainability Reports in the mining sector. The points raised by this research suggest that this may be challenging based on the information provided.
MbyRes Dissertations
Doctoral College
Item views 0
Full item downloads 0
Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
Sustainability across the Neotropics: an archaeological perspective from the pre-Columbian Maya lowlands to the Amazon basin
Van Dalen, B (University of Exeter Archaeology, 28 October 2024)Sustainability has become a critical issue in today's world. This enormous challenge is shared by the scientific, political, and public worlds, influencing thought and action from the household to international platforms ... -
The moderating role of CEO sustainability reporting style in the relationship between sustainability performance, sustainability reporting, and cost of equity
Lopatta, K; Kaspereit, T; Tideman, SA; et al. (Springer, 29 March 2022)This paper explores the role of individual managers in the relationship between sustainability performance, sustainability reporting, and cost of equity. Based on prior research showing that both sustainability performance ... -
Construction Industry 4.0 and Sustainability: An Enabling Framework
Balasubramanian, S; Islam, N; Shukla, V; et al. (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE), 11 October 2021)Governments worldwide are taking actions to address the construction sector's sustainability concerns, including high carbon emissions, health and safety risks, low productivity, and increasing costs. ...