dc.contributor.author | Pimm-Smith, R | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-09-30T13:24:55Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2022-06-08 | |
dc.date.updated | 2022-09-30T12:45:29Z | |
dc.description.abstract | This article explores how child neglect was criminalised during the period that the first statutory offence existed but was not enforced. The article addresses a gap in scholarship by exploring the Victorian origins of
the neglect law and the ways it disproportionately penalised poor families when a child suffered from a lack
of material provision. This was particularly true for biological mothers and a limited number of biological fathers who were treated more harshly by Victorian juries if they transgressed middle-class expectations of
gender. Class conflict and gender bias featured heavily in the trials involving neglectful parenting which, this
article asserts, provides another example of the ways that the poor were punished for their economic misfortune during the late-nineteenth century. Understanding the effectiveness of enforcement during this period is
important because of the heavy reliance of modern neglect law on Victorian legislation. | en_GB |
dc.format.extent | 189-211 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Vol. 34, pp. 189-211 | en_GB |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10871/131046 | |
dc.identifier | ORCID: 0000-0002-9413-1073 (Pimm-Smith, Rachel) | |
dc.language.iso | en | en_GB |
dc.publisher | Family Law | en_GB |
dc.rights.embargoreason | Under embargo until 8 June 2023 in compliance with publisher policy | en_GB |
dc.rights | © 2022 LexisNexis®. All rights reserved | en_GB |
dc.subject | Child neglect | en_GB |
dc.subject | legal history | en_GB |
dc.subject | poverty | en_GB |
dc.subject | gender | en_GB |
dc.subject | child protection | en_GB |
dc.title | 'A newborn of respectable class would have weighed more' : Class, gender and child neglect in late-nineteenth century England | en_GB |
dc.type | Article | en_GB |
dc.date.available | 2022-09-30T13:24:55Z | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1358-8184 | |
dc.description | This is the author accepted manuscript. The final version is available from Family Law via the URL in this record | en_GB |
dc.identifier.journal | Child and Family Law Quarterly | en_GB |
dc.rights.uri | http://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved | en_GB |
dcterms.dateAccepted | 2022-04-28 | |
dcterms.dateSubmitted | 2022-03-02 | |
rioxxterms.version | AM | en_GB |
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate | 2022-06-08 | |
rioxxterms.type | Journal Article/Review | en_GB |
refterms.dateFCD | 2022-09-30T12:45:31Z | |
refterms.versionFCD | P | |
refterms.dateFOA | 2023-06-07T23:00:00Z | |
refterms.panel | C | en_GB |
refterms.dateFirstOnline | 2022-06-08 | |