Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBosch, G
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-21T09:43:17Z
dc.date.issued2020-05-16
dc.date.updated2022-10-20T14:52:45Z
dc.description.abstractThe article wishes to present an argument about how interdisciplinary modules can enhance legal education. This argument is developed against the backdrop of major disruption in higher education and transformation in legal education. Following a definition of interdisciplinarity, the benefits of this method are analysed and demonstrated through practical examples from an interdisciplinary pilot module based in a UK Law programme. Some selected issues from Equality law will be used to demonstrate how an interdisciplinary approach has enabled students to look more critically at what the law chooses to protect and the ways in which laws are drafted and applied. Such enhanced learning outcomes from interdisciplinary legal education can support the re-calibration of legal education and complement the traditional doctrinal approach to legal education. It is argued that experiences and good practice from comparative law can provide inspiration for the strengthening of interdisciplinary legal education.en_GB
dc.identifier.citationVol. 1(1), pp. 27 - 48en_GB
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/131359
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherEuropean Law Faculties Associationen_GB
dc.relation.urlhttps://www.ejle.eu/index.php/EJLE/article/view/4en_GB
dc.rights© 2020 European Law Faculties Association. Open access under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International Licenseen_GB
dc.subjectinterdisciplinarityen_GB
dc.subjectlegal educationen_GB
dc.subjectequality and diversityen_GB
dc.subjectcomparative lawen_GB
dc.subjectdoctrinal lawen_GB
dc.subjecttransformation of legal educationen_GB
dc.titleDeconstructing Myths about Interdisciplinarity: is now the time to rethink interdisciplinarity in legal education?en_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2022-10-21T09:43:17Z
dc.identifier.issn1684-1360
dc.descriptionThis is the final version. Available on open access from the European Law Faculties Association via the link in this recorden_GB
dc.identifier.journalEuropean Journal of Legal Educationen_GB
dc.relation.ispartofEuropean Journal of Legal Education
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/en_GB
dcterms.dateAccepted2020-05-01
dcterms.dateSubmitted2020-01-16
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_GB
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2020-05-16
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_GB
refterms.dateFCD2022-10-20T14:52:47Z
refterms.versionFCDAM
refterms.dateFOA2022-10-21T09:43:59Z
refterms.panelCen_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

© 2020 European Law Faculties Association. Open access under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License
Except where otherwise noted, this item's licence is described as © 2020 European Law Faculties Association. Open access under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License