Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHelm, RK
dc.date.accessioned2023-02-27T09:03:03Z
dc.date.issued2023-02-28
dc.date.updated2023-02-25T17:19:03Z
dc.description.abstractThis paper presents an analysis of 88 criminal convictions that have since been quashed on the basis of error of fact (wrongful convictions) that have occurred in England and Wales since 2007, in the context of a wider set of 389 wrongful convictions that have occurred in England and Wales since 1970. Based on this analysis, three key contributors of concern are identified as having been influential in leading to wrongful convictions recently - digital evidence, guilty pleas, and misleading testimony. Cases involving each of these factors are discussed, including cases from the Post Office Scandal, which make up many of the identified wrongful convictions during this period. In considering each factor, failings in the criminal justice system that leave defendants vulnerable to wrongful conviction are discussed. The paper concludes with brief initial suggestions for reform to provide greater protection against highlighted vulnerabilities.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipUK Research and Innovationen_GB
dc.identifier.citationVol. 3 (3), pp. 196 - 217en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.29173/wclawr79
dc.identifier.grantnumberMR/T02027X/1en_GB
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/132556
dc.identifierORCID: 0000-0003-1429-3847 (Helm, Rebecca)
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherUniversity of Albertaen_GB
dc.rights© 2023 The author(s). Open access under a Creative Commons-Attribution-Noncommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International licence
dc.subjectWrongful conviction
dc.subjectGuilty pleas
dc.subjectTestimony
dc.subjectAppeals
dc.subjectDigital Evidence
dc.subjectCriminal Evidence
dc.subjectCriminal Procedure
dc.titleWrongful Conviction in England and Wales: An Assessment of Successful Appeals and Key Contributorsen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2023-02-27T09:03:03Z
dc.descriptionThis is the final version. Available on open access from the University of Alberta via the DOI in this recorden_GB
dc.identifier.eissn2563-2574
dc.identifier.journalWrongful Conviction Law Reviewen_GB
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/en_GB
dcterms.dateAccepted2022-10-11
dcterms.dateSubmitted2022-11-04
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_GB
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2022-10-11
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_GB
refterms.dateFCD2023-02-25T17:19:10Z
refterms.versionFCDAM
refterms.dateFOA2023-03-01T13:48:02Z
refterms.panelCen_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

© 2023 The author(s). Open access under a Creative Commons-Attribution-Noncommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International licence
Except where otherwise noted, this item's licence is described as © 2023 The author(s). Open access under a Creative Commons-Attribution-Noncommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International licence