Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorCole, M
dc.contributor.authorHartmann, S
dc.date.accessioned2023-04-21T08:32:02Z
dc.date.issued2023-04-14
dc.date.updated2023-04-20T19:42:45Z
dc.description.abstractThis article draws on direct archival evidence from the Committee responsible for drafting the Gesetz gegen Wettbewerbsbeschränkungen 1957 (GWB) to establish what the priorities and beliefs of the Ordoliberals (broadly construed) were during the mid- to late-1950s. This is done primarily by analysing the views expressed by Franz Böhm, Finance Minister Ludwig Erhard and Alfred Müller-Armack. This work is important as it challenges the current understanding of Ordoliberalism. It reveals that aspects of the current understanding of Ordoliberalism are either flawed or do not take into account the changes that occurred between the submission of the Josten Draft (1949) and the drafting of the GWB (enacted 1957). This evidence also challenges the argument that the influence of Ordoliberalism on EU competition law has been exaggerated.en_GB
dc.identifier.citationPublished online 14 April 2023en_GB
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2230.12806
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/132959
dc.identifierORCID: 0000-0003-4797-2256 (Cole, Matthew)
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherWileyen_GB
dc.rights© 2023 The Authors. The Modern Law Review published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Modern Law Review Limited. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.en_GB
dc.titleOrdoliberalism: What we know and what we think we knowen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2023-04-21T08:32:02Z
dc.identifier.issn0026-7961
dc.descriptionThis is the final version. Available from Wiley via the DOI in this record. en_GB
dc.identifier.eissn1468-2230
dc.identifier.journalModern Law Reviewen_GB
dc.relation.ispartofModern Law Review
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_GB
dcterms.dateAccepted2023-03-10
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_GB
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2023-04-14
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_GB
refterms.dateFCD2023-04-21T08:29:02Z
refterms.versionFCDVoR
refterms.dateFOA2023-04-21T08:32:04Z
refterms.panelCen_GB
refterms.dateFirstOnline2023-04-14


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

© 2023 The Authors. The Modern Law Review published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Modern Law Review Limited.

This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Except where otherwise noted, this item's licence is described as © 2023 The Authors. The Modern Law Review published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Modern Law Review Limited. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.