Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPowell, A
dc.contributor.authorRifath, F
dc.date.accessioned2023-05-24T09:49:47Z
dc.date.issued2023-10-18
dc.date.updated2023-05-24T09:06:12Z
dc.description.abstractIn this short piece we focus on two of the main changes brought in by the recent Nationality and Borders Act 2022 with a focus on sexually diverse claimants: inadmissibility and the increased standard of proof. The recent changes have a negative impact on all asylum seekers but we highlight that they have a particularly adverse impact on sexually diverse claimants because their diverse backgrounds have not been appropriately considered. The problematic provisions on inadmissibility on the basis of mode of entry and removal to a ‘third safe country’ pose particular risks for sexual minorities. Additionally, the increased standard of proof exaggerates issues already faced by sexually diverse claimants in relation to objective evidence gathering and decision-makers using guidance riddled with stereotypical understandings about sexual minorities.en_GB
dc.identifier.citationPublished online 18 October 2023en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.1017/lst.2023.21
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/133227
dc.identifierORCID: 0000-0002-3241-2339 (Rifath, Faatimah)
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherCambridge University Press / The Society of Legal Scholarsen_GB
dc.rights© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Society of Legal Scholars. This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
dc.subjectmigration and asylum law
dc.subjectNationality and Borders Act 2022
dc.subjectsexual diversity
dc.titleSexual diversity and the Nationality and Borders Act 2022en_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2023-05-24T09:49:47Z
dc.identifier.issn0261-3875
dc.descriptionThis is the final version. Available on open access from Cambridge University Press via the DOI in this recorden_GB
dc.identifier.eissn1748-121X
dc.identifier.journalLegal Studiesen_GB
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_GB
dcterms.dateAccepted2023-05-05
dcterms.dateSubmitted2023-03-21
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_GB
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2023-05-05
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_GB
refterms.dateFCD2023-05-24T09:06:15Z
refterms.versionFCDAM
refterms.dateFOA2023-12-15T15:13:31Z
refterms.panelCen_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Society of Legal Scholars. This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Except where otherwise noted, this item's licence is described as © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Society of Legal Scholars. This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.