dc.contributor.author | Cole, M | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-06-23T08:38:01Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2023-09-26 | |
dc.date.updated | 2023-06-22T14:33:32Z | |
dc.description.abstract | Considers how the EU's "Intel saga" has changed the conditional rebates regime. Discusses the main case law, the problems of the current data-dependant approach of Intel Corp Inc v European Commission (T-286/09 RENV) (GC), and how the impending appeal offers a chance to clarify the position. | en_GB |
dc.identifier.citation | Vol. 44(10), pp. 419 - 428 | en_GB |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10871/133487 | |
dc.identifier | ORCID: 0000-0003-4797-2256 (Cole, Matthew) | |
dc.language.iso | en | en_GB |
dc.publisher | Sweet and Maxwell | en_GB |
dc.rights.embargoreason | Under embargo until 26 September 2024 in compliance with publisher policy | en_GB |
dc.rights | © 2023 Sweet and Maxwell | |
dc.subject | Competition Law | en_GB |
dc.subject | Intel case | en_GB |
dc.subject | Abuse of dominance | en_GB |
dc.subject | Conditional rebates | en_GB |
dc.subject | Loyalty Rebates | en_GB |
dc.title | No data, no abuse: the lesson from Intel's "more economic approach" | en_GB |
dc.type | Article | en_GB |
dc.date.available | 2023-06-23T08:38:01Z | |
dc.identifier.issn | 0144-3054 | |
dc.description | This is the author accepted manuscript. The final version is available from Sweet and Maxwell | en_GB |
dc.identifier.journal | European Competition Law Review | en_GB |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ | en_GB |
dcterms.dateAccepted | 2023-05-03 | |
dcterms.dateSubmitted | 2023-04-05 | |
rioxxterms.version | AM | en_GB |
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate | 2023-05-03 | |
rioxxterms.type | Journal Article/Review | en_GB |
refterms.dateFCD | 2023-06-22T14:33:34Z | |
refterms.versionFCD | AM | |
refterms.dateFOA | 2024-09-25T23:00:00Z | |
refterms.panel | C | en_GB |