Self-directed learning and student-centred learning are key theoretical
constructs in the educational literature. However, to date, the similarities and differences between these terms have not been examined.
This paper therefore provides a historical overview of both constructs,
followed by an analysis of the similarities and ...
Self-directed learning and student-centred learning are key theoretical
constructs in the educational literature. However, to date, the similarities and differences between these terms have not been examined.
This paper therefore provides a historical overview of both constructs,
followed by an analysis of the similarities and differences between
them. The analysis found that student-centred learning has been
interpreted in a much broader and more inconsistent way than selfdirected learning, and that any conceptual comparison is dependent
on the ways in which student-centred learning is interpreted. In particular, the inclusion or non-inclusion of the notion of power-sharing is
key when comparing student-centred learning to self-directed learning. If power-sharing is not considered part of student-centred learning, learning might be student-centred and not yet self-directed. An
original and important conclusion from the present work is that: only if
power-sharing is considered part of student-centred learning can
learning be both student-centred and self-directed. Increased clarity
around the meanings of these concepts will benefit teachers and other
educational stakeholders and will allow us to conduct more valid
research to examine the potential impacts of such approaches.