Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMulder, LB
dc.contributor.authorKurz, T
dc.contributor.authorProsser, AMB
dc.contributor.authorFonseca, MA
dc.date.accessioned2024-02-15T10:23:37Z
dc.date.issued2024-02-09
dc.date.updated2024-02-15T08:43:33Z
dc.description.abstractPolicy makers often implement laws or mandates to attempt to change people’s behavior. Such policies act not only as deterrents, but also as societal signposts for what is considered morally right and wrong within a society. In this paper we argue that the presence of laws and mandates may be associated with citizens’ inclination to engage in social norm enforcement within their own network. We studied this using four different datasets in different settings (text-and-drive laws, influenza vaccination mandates, speed limit laws, and COVID-19 mask mandates), in three different countries (total N = 3,156). In all datasets, we found associations between mandates or laws and the inclination to socially confront norm violators. This is in line with our theorizing that mandates and laws may help to increase citizens’ inclination to engage in social norm enforcement, and to foster interpersonal policing of behavior, inviting future research to establish more direct causal conclusions in this regard.en_GB
dc.format.extent102703-
dc.identifier.citationVol. 101, article 102703en_GB
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2024.102703
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/135315
dc.identifierORCID: 0000-0002-5294-6784 (Fonseca, Miguel A)
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherElsevieren_GB
dc.rights© 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)en_GB
dc.subjectMandatesen_GB
dc.subjectLawsen_GB
dc.subjectSocial norm enforcementen_GB
dc.subjectSocial confrontationen_GB
dc.subjectInformal sanctionsen_GB
dc.subjectPeer-sanctioningen_GB
dc.titleThe presence of laws and mandates is associated with increased social norm enforcementen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2024-02-15T10:23:37Z
dc.identifier.issn0167-4870
exeter.article-number102703
dc.descriptionThis is the final version. Available on open access from Elsevier via the DOI in this recorden_GB
dc.descriptionData availability: I have made my data available in OSF and in the paper the link to this data is shareden_GB
dc.identifier.journalJournal of Economic Psychologyen_GB
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Economic Psychology
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_GB
dcterms.dateAccepted2024-02-06
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_GB
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2024-02-09
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_GB
refterms.dateFCD2024-02-15T10:17:51Z
refterms.versionFCDVoR
refterms.dateFOA2024-02-15T10:23:38Z
refterms.panelCen_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

© 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
Except where otherwise noted, this item's licence is described as © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)