Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHawkins, Naomi
dc.date.accessioned2014-12-01T15:32:32Z
dc.date.issued2012-08-17
dc.description.abstractMany patents on human genes have been granted by the major patent offices around the world, and these patents highlight some of the key difficulties of patents in fields of new technology. A particular concern which has arisen in both academic and popular literature has been the effect that gene patents have on the development and delivery of genetic tests, and authors have theorized that gene patents will decrease patient access to vital genetic testing services. However, empirical research in Europe has found that these theoretical problems do not exist in practice, not because patents are appropriately managed, but because they are largely ignored. Gene patents thus give rise to two distinct difficulties in practice: concerns about patient access, and concerns about divergence between the law and practice. The purpose of this paper is to critically examine the nature of these two problems, and their relationship to each other, and to propose and evaluate a novel solution, in the form of an exception to infringement for diagnostic testing. It is argued that this solution appropriately addresses the divergence between the law and practice, and at the same time, allows optimization of innovation and patient access to medical care.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipWellcome Trusten_GB
dc.identifier.citationVol. 43, No. 6, pp. 641 - 661en_GB
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/15962
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherMax Planck Instituteen_GB
dc.relation.urlhttp://www.ip.mpg.de/files/pdf2/IIC_6_2012.pdfen_GB
dc.subjectGenetic Testingen_GB
dc.subjectGene patentsen_GB
dc.titleAn exception to infringement for genetic testing – addressing patient access and divergence between law and practiceen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2014-12-01T15:32:32Z
dc.identifier.issn0018-9855
dc.descriptionPost print deposited in accordance with the publisher's republication policy which permits posting of author final after a two year exclusivity period has lapsed. A definitive version was subsequently published in IIC - International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law 2012, Vol. 43, No.56, pp.641-661. http://www.ip.mpg.de/files/pdf2/IIC_6_2012.pdfen_GB
dc.identifier.eissn2195-0237
dc.identifier.journalIIC - International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Lawen_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record