| dc.contributor.author | Tamblyn, NAL | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2014-12-01T16:33:30Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2014 | |
| dc.description.abstract | This article argues that a defence of entitlement should be recognized in the law of unjust enrichment, consistently with the case law and sound principle, and in mutual support of a rule against leapfrogging. In so doing, this article also explores the relationship between unjust enrichment and contract. | en_GB |
| dc.identifier.citation | Vol. 44, Part 2, pp. 551-562 | en_GB |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10871/15966 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | en_GB |
| dc.publisher | Sweet & Maxwell | en_GB |
| dc.publisher | University of Hong Kong | en_GB |
| dc.relation.url | http://www.law.hku.hk/hklj/2014-Vol-44.php | en_GB |
| dc.rights | © 2014 Hong Kong Law Journal. Author's final version deposited with permission of the journal editorial board and Sweet & Maxwell publishers. | |
| dc.subject | unjust enrichment | en_GB |
| dc.subject | defence | en_GB |
| dc.subject | entitlement | en_GB |
| dc.subject | leapfrogging | en_GB |
| dc.title | Unjust enrichment, leapfrogging, and a defence of entitlement | en_GB |
| dc.type | Article | en_GB |
| dc.date.available | 2014-12-01T16:33:30Z | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 0378-0600 | |
| dc.description | A definitive version is available online on a current, full text basis on the Westlaw database - http://www.westlaw.com | en_GB |
| dc.identifier.journal | Hong Kong Law Journal | en_GB |
| refterms.dateFOA | 2020-03-23T15:03:47Z | |
