Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorChakravarty, Surajeet
dc.contributor.authorFonseca, Miguel A.
dc.date.accessioned2015-01-27T12:28:17Z
dc.date.issued2014-12
dc.description.abstractWe study the role of social identity in determining the impact of social fragmentation on public good provision using laboratory experiments. We find that as long as there is some degree of social fragmentation, increasing it leads to lower public good provision by majority group members. This is mainly because the share of those in the majority group who contribute fully to the public good diminishes with social fragmentation, while the share of free-riders is unchanged. This suggests social identity preferences drive our result, as opposed to self-interest. Importantly, we find no difference in contribution between homogeneous and maximally-fragmented treatments, reinforcing our finding that majority groups contribute most in the presence of some diversity.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipEconomic and Social Research Councilen_GB
dc.identifier.citationVol. 53, pp. 1 - 9en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.socec.2014.07.002
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/16242
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherElsevieren_GB
dc.relation.urlhttp://www.journals.elsevier.com/journal-of-behavioral-and-experimental-economics/en_GB
dc.relation.urlhttp://business-school.exeter.ac.uk/documents/papers/economics/2012/1207.pdfen_GB
dc.relation.urlhttp://www.esrc.ac.uk/my-esrc/grants/RES-000-22-3941/readen_GB
dc.subjectSocial identityen_GB
dc.subjectPublic goodsen_GB
dc.subjectSocial fragmentationen_GB
dc.subjectExperimentsen_GB
dc.titleThe effect of social fragmentation on public good provision : an experimental studyen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2015-01-27T12:28:17Z
dc.identifier.issn2214-8043
dc.descriptionpublication-status: Publisheden_GB
dc.descriptiontypes: Articleen_GB
dc.descriptionNOTICE: this is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, vol. 53, pp. 1-9 doi:10.1016/j.socec.2014.07.002en_GB
dc.descriptionThis version originally published in University of Exeter Economics Department Discussion Papers Series as paper number 12/07en_GB
dc.identifier.journalJournal of Behavioral and Experimental Economicsen_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record