Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorDupré, John
dc.date.accessioned2015-04-14T16:04:49Z
dc.date.issued2013-01-31
dc.description.abstractThis paper takes up an idea that has interested me for some years: the idea that, contrary to a very widely shared assumption, a radically indeterministic metaphysics does provide a way of understanding human freedom as a real and important feature of the world. However, whereas I used to think of this as a solution to the free will problem within the tradition of radical voluntarism, I now prefer to present it under the rubric of indeterminist compatibilism. In the most crucial respects this position remains true to the voluntarist tradition, but in its current incarnation it aims to capture the powerful intuitions that underlie compatibilist thinking.en_GB
dc.identifier.citationVol. 1, No. 1, pp. 79 - 92en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.4454/philinq.v1i1.8
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/16817
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherEdizioni ETSen_GB
dc.subjectfree willen_GB
dc.subjectindeterminismen_GB
dc.subjectcausationen_GB
dc.subjectLibeten_GB
dc.subjectneuroscienceen_GB
dc.titleHow much of the free will problem does (the right kind of) indeterminism solve?en_GB
dc.typeArticle
dc.date.available2015-04-14T16:04:49Z
dc.identifier.issn2282-0248
exeter.place-of-publicationItaly
dc.identifier.journalPhilosophical Inquiriesen_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record