IP, Disability, culture and exceptionalism: does copyright law deal with difference?
Reason for embargo
Publisher 18 month embargo
This chapter explores the extent to which human rights laws relating to disability and copyright conflict or complement each other. Does copyright consider itself lex specialis? If one sees the human rights and disability treaties as governing only general obligations, and copyright the specific, does copyright override what human rights and disability would otherwise dictate? Focusing on two case studies which involve human rights from different perspectives – one considers creation (the disabled dancer and her dance), and one considers use (people with visual impairments and access to books) – this chapter will look to developments in policy, international instruments, European and some domestic (UK) law to explore the relationship between these areas of law. Both creators and users of copyright works have an interest in the human rights and disability instruments and activism, and the agenda which results. Consider a choreographer and dancer with disability, who is recognised as a leader in the field of dance, or blind or partially sighted person wishing to access and enjoy the latest books in the bestseller list.
This is the author's version of a work accepted for publication by Edward Elgar.
A definitive version of this book chapter was published by Edward Elgar. It appears as Chapter 11, pp. 215-246 in 'Intellectual Property and General Legal Principles: Is IP a Lex Specialis?' ATRIP Intellectual Property series, Edited by Graeme B. Dinwoodie. The definitive version is available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.4337/9781784714956
pp. 215 - 245 (Chapter 11)
Place of publication