Asking About What is Better: Intersex, Disability and Inaugurated Eschatology
Cornwall, Susannah
Date: 13 November 2013
Article
Journal
Journal of Religion, Disability and Health
Publisher
Taylor & Francis (Routledge)
Publisher DOI
Abstract
Intersex conditions, in which individuals’ bodies cannot be categorized as clearly male or female, might be figured as a nonpathological physical variation akin to an impairment. Such a comparison may be problematic in some respects, but debates surrounding sexuality and the ethics of prenatal testing demonstrate that parallels exist ...
Intersex conditions, in which individuals’ bodies cannot be categorized as clearly male or female, might be figured as a nonpathological physical variation akin to an impairment. Such a comparison may be problematic in some respects, but debates surrounding sexuality and the ethics of prenatal testing demonstrate that parallels exist in the ways that intersex bodies and disabled bodies are understood. Juergen Moltmann’s work is used to argue that justice-oriented eschatological theologies for intersex people must figure their bodies non-pathologically, always asking about what is better, and that this focus might fruitfully include closer attention to the stories and testimonies of intersex people themselves.
Classics, Ancient History, Religion and Theology
Faculty of Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences
Item views 0
Full item downloads 0