Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSkinner, SJ
dc.date.accessioned2015-09-30T14:44:08Z
dc.date.issued2015-12-14
dc.description.abstractSituated in relation to on-going critical discussion of the theory and practice of the rule of law in historical perspective, this article undertakes a comparative analysis of the offences of vilification of the State in the 1930 Italian Penal Code and the crime of seditious libel in English common law during the interwar period. It argues that there were important commonalities in the scope and objectives of these offences, which indicate that the apparently divergent legal systems of Fascist Italy and democratic Britain shared a similar approach to the conception and protection of State interests and their relationship with the rule of law. The article uses that historical comparison to highlight key continuities and tensions within each system, in order to question the meanings and significance of legal certainty and the rule of law, to reconsider theoretical interpretations of State power and law in the twentieth century, and to challenge understanding of common European (liberal) legal traditions as a positive force today.en_GB
dc.identifier.citationPublished online: December 14, 2015en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/ojls/gqv034
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/18346
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherOxford University Press (OUP)en_GB
dc.rights.embargoreasonPublisher policyen_GB
dc.titleCrimes Against the State and the Intersection of Fascism and Democracy in the 1920s-30s: Vilification, Seditious Libel and the Limits of Legalityen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.identifier.issn0143-6503
dc.descriptionThis is the author accepted manuscript. The final version is available from Oxford University Press via the DOI in this record.
dc.identifier.journalOxford Journal of Legal Studiesen_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record