Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGarland, Fae Sinead
dc.date.accessioned2015-11-09T16:12:12Z
dc.date.issued2015-09
dc.description.abstractSection 28 Family Law (Scotland) Act 2006 provides a system of financial provision for cohabitants upon separation that centres on redressing economic imbalances to ensure no-one is dramatically better or worse off financially than the other as a result of the relationship. Designed to be similar yet different to the marital regime, this section fundamentally sought to balance the need to protect the financially vulnerable against the need to respect the autonomy of those who have chosen not to marry. Yet how far has s 28’s balancing act protected the economically vulnerable in practice? Moreover, given that research has consistently demonstrated that it is women who are most frequently left in an economically vulnerable position upon separation has s 28 reduced the gendered imbalances that can manifest themselves upon separation? To answer these questions, this paper explores the gendered impact of s 28 and considers how effectively this section has operated in practice.en_GB
dc.identifier.citationVolume 19, Issue 3, Page 311-332en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.3366/elr.2015.0293
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/18601
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherEdinburgh University Pressen_GB
dc.relation.urlhttp://www.euppublishing.com/doi/abs/10.3366/elr.2015.0293en_GB
dc.subjectfamily lawen_GB
dc.subjectFamily Law (Scotland) Act 2006en_GB
dc.subjectgenderen_GB
dc.subjecteconomic imbalancesen_GB
dc.subjecteconomic vulnerabilityen_GB
dc.subjectseparationen_GB
dc.subjectfinancial settlementen_GB
dc.titleGender imbalances, economic vulnerability and cohabitation: evaluating the gendered impact of Section 28 Family Law (Scotland) Act 2006en_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2015-11-09T16:12:12Z
dc.identifier.issn1755-1692
dc.descriptionAccepteden_GB
dc.descriptionArticleen_GB
dc.descriptionThis article was accepted for publication in Edinburgh Law Review, Volume 19, Issue 3, Page 311-332 available at http://www.euppublishing.com/doi/abs/10.3366/elr.2015.0293en_GB
dc.identifier.journalEdinburgh Law Review: an international forum for the discussion of lawen_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record