Pollinator declines: Avoid pitfalls of consensus methods.
dc.contributor.author | Bateman, IJ | |
dc.contributor.author | Agarwala, M | |
dc.contributor.author | Bad'ura, T | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2016-01-28T09:23:49Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2014-01-08 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Vol. 505, article 160 | en_GB |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1038/505160d | |
dc.identifier.other | 505160d | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10871/19386 | |
dc.language.iso | en | en_GB |
dc.publisher | Nature Publishing Group | en_GB |
dc.relation.url | http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24402273 | en_GB |
dc.rights | Copyright © 2014 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved | en_GB |
dc.subject | Animals | en_GB |
dc.subject | Humans | en_GB |
dc.subject | Public Policy | en_GB |
dc.subject | Review Literature as Topic | en_GB |
dc.title | Pollinator declines: Avoid pitfalls of consensus methods. | en_GB |
dc.type | Article | en_GB |
dc.date.available | 2016-01-28T09:23:49Z | |
dc.identifier.issn | 0028-0836 | |
exeter.place-of-publication | England | |
dc.identifier.eissn | 1476-4687 | |
dc.identifier.journal | Nature | en_GB |
refterms.dateFOA | 2019-09-27T14:01:16Z |