Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHuntingford, C
dc.contributor.authorFisher, RA
dc.contributor.authorMercado, L
dc.contributor.authorBooth, BB
dc.contributor.authorSitch, S
dc.contributor.authorHarris, PP
dc.contributor.authorCox, PM
dc.contributor.authorJones, CD
dc.contributor.authorBetts, RA
dc.contributor.authorMalhi, Y
dc.contributor.authorHarris, GR
dc.contributor.authorCollins, M
dc.contributor.authorMoorcroft, P
dc.date.accessioned2016-03-01T13:35:43Z
dc.date.issued2008-05-27
dc.description.abstractSimulations with the Hadley Centre general circulation model (HadCM3), including carbon cycle model and forced by a 'business-as-usual' emissions scenario, predict a rapid loss of Amazonian rainforest from the middle of this century onwards. The robustness of this projection to both uncertainty in physical climate drivers and the formulation of the land surface scheme is investigated. We analyse how the modelled vegetation cover in Amazonia responds to (i) uncertainty in the parameters specified in the atmosphere component of HadCM3 and their associated influence on predicted surface climate. We then enhance the land surface description and (ii) implement a multilayer canopy light interception model and compare with the simple 'big-leaf' approach used in the original simulations. Finally, (iii) we investigate the effect of changing the method of simulating vegetation dynamics from an area-based model (TRIFFID) to a more complex size- and age-structured approximation of an individual-based model (ecosystem demography). We find that the loss of Amazonian rainforest is robust across the climate uncertainty explored by perturbed physics simulations covering a wide range of global climate sensitivity. The introduction of the refined light interception model leads to an increase in simulated gross plant carbon uptake for the present day, but, with altered respiration, the net effect is a decrease in net primary productivity. However, this does not significantly affect the carbon loss from vegetation and soil as a consequence of future simulated depletion in soil moisture; the Amazon forest is still lost. The introduction of the more sophisticated dynamic vegetation model reduces but does not halt the rate of forest dieback. The potential for human-induced climate change to trigger the loss of Amazon rainforest appears robust within the context of the uncertainties explored in this paper. Some further uncertainties should be explored, particularly with respect to the representation of rooting depth.en_GB
dc.identifier.citationVol. 363, pp. 1857 - 1864en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.1098/rstb.2007.0028
dc.identifier.otherBW15378400L241J4
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/20326
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherRoyal Societyen_GB
dc.relation.urlhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18267905en_GB
dc.subjectConservation of Natural Resourcesen_GB
dc.subjectEcosystemen_GB
dc.subjectForecastingen_GB
dc.subjectGreenhouse Effecten_GB
dc.subjectLighten_GB
dc.subjectModels, Biologicalen_GB
dc.subjectTreesen_GB
dc.subjectUncertaintyen_GB
dc.titleTowards quantifying uncertainty in predictions of Amazon 'dieback'.en_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2016-03-01T13:35:43Z
dc.identifier.issn0962-8436
exeter.place-of-publicationEngland
dc.descriptionThis is the final version of the article. It first appeared from The Royal Society via http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2007.0028en_GB
dc.identifier.journalPhilosophical Transactions B: Biological Sciencesen_GB
dc.identifier.pmcidPMC2374898
dc.identifier.pmid18267905


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record