Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorZhang, LE
dc.contributor.authorGuttormsen, David S.A.
dc.date.accessioned2016-03-07T09:47:08Z
dc.date.issued2016-03-12
dc.description.abstractPurpose: Although qualitative methods have now gained a stronger foothold in International Business (IB) research, they remain under-researched, especially regarding how researchers can overcome obstacles created when interviewers exhibit ‘multiculturality’ during international field research projects. This paper analyses how researchers’ multicultural backgrounds create challenges and opportunities in data collection during in-depth interviewing, and how such backgrounds further impact on the power imbalance between researchers and interviewees. Design/Methodology/Approach: The two multicultural co-authors of this paper draw upon their 141 in-depth interview experiences with expatriates and local staff across five separate field research projects in Mainland China, Hong Kong SAR, South Korea, Finland, and the US. Field research experiences are analysed through a Bourdieusian inspired ‘epistemic reflexive’ self-interrogation process between the two co-authors. Findings: This paper suggests five strategies to cope with the power imbalance between the researcher and the respondent in terms of social categorisation and language: activating the ‘favoured’ ethnicity, putting the ‘desired’ passport forward, constantly reassuring of belonging to the ‘right’ social category, bonding in the interviewee’s mother tongue and adopting a multilingual approach characterised by frequent code-switching. Originality/value: This paper emphasises the relevance of exploratory, self-reflexive analysis, and uncovers how social categorisation and language influence the interviewer-interviewee power imbalance. Distinct methodological contributions are proposed accordingly for IB literature: placing ‘multiculturality’ as an important concept at the forefront of qualitative IB research; and identifying ethnicity and accent as key factors in terms of securing and conducting interviews. Keywords: Multiculturality; International Business research; in-depth interview; expatriate; language; social categorisation; field research.en_GB
dc.identifier.citationVol. 23 (2),en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.1108/CCSM-07-2014-0084
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/20519
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherEmeralden_GB
dc.rights.embargoreasonPublisher policyen_GB
dc.rightsThis is the author accepted manuscript. The final version is available from Emerald via the DOI in this record.
dc.subjectMulticulturalityen_GB
dc.subjectInternational Business researchen_GB
dc.subjectin-depth interviewen_GB
dc.subjectexpatriateen_GB
dc.subjectlanguageen_GB
dc.subjectsocial categorisationen_GB
dc.subjectfield researchen_GB
dc.title‘Multiculturality’ as a Key Methodological Challenge during In-depth Interviewing in International Business Research’en_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.contributor.editorTung, RL
dc.identifier.issn1758-6089
dc.identifier.journalCross Cultural Management: An International Journalen_GB
refterms.dateFOA2018-03-21T00:00:00Z


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record