Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorNorwich, B
dc.date.accessioned2017-02-24T15:59:34Z
dc.date.issued2016-12-27
dc.description.abstractThis conceptual paper examines the issues in the use of term “special educational needs” in England over the last 40 years and from this identifies what kind of additional needs’ principles are required for educational services. The paper then examines to what extent the child and youth version of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF-CY) has the potential to meet these assessment principles. The paper illustrates that the potential of the ICF-CY by reference to studies that show how the ICF has been used to enhance assessment relevant to program planning. Several studies showed how assessment instruments designed for diagnostic assessment could be linked to ICF dimensions. Other projects illustrated how the ICF framework can also provide the basis for designing dependable measurement questionnaires. But, measurement issues still need to be addressed by further development research. There has been relatively little use of the ICF-CY in educational settings and for eligibility decisions about scarce education provision, despite the ICF’s use in Portugal and parts of Italy and Switzerland. Research in these countries show the usefulness of the ICF as a resource for decision-making, but analyses of Individual Educational Programs show fidelity issues in the ICF use and the need for enhanced teacher training. The Swiss conceptual expansion of the ICF-CY takes account of an educational perspective, and its implementation with procedures and materials has direct relevance to England. The Swiss development brings out the importance of understanding the different aspects of the ICF and how it can be adapted for different purposes. In adopting the ICF for an additional needs framework in education, eligibility decisions will require norms about functioning and the environment. It is concluded that these norms should be negotiated with service users who are to be treated as having rights to participate in assessment and decision-making. It is concluded that there is potential for the development and use of an ICF-informed approach to assessment and decision-making in England.en_GB
dc.identifier.citationVol. 1, article 5en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.3389/feduc.2016.00005
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/26064
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherFrontiers Mediaen_GB
dc.rightsOpen access. Copyright: © 2016 Norwich. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY): https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.en_GB
dc.subjectInternational Classification of Functioningen_GB
dc.subjectICFen_GB
dc.subjectbio-psycho-social modelen_GB
dc.subjectspecial educational needsen_GB
dc.subjectSENen_GB
dc.subjectIEPsen_GB
dc.subjectfunctional assessmenten_GB
dc.titleConceptualizing Special Educational Needs Using a Biopsychosocial Model in England: The Prospects and Challenges of Using the International Classification of Functioning Frameworken_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2017-02-24T15:59:34Z
dc.descriptionThis is the author accepted manuscript. The final version is available from Frontiers Media via the DOI in this record.en_GB
dc.identifier.journalFrontiers in Educationen_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record