Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSmithson, J
dc.contributor.authorBarlow, A
dc.contributor.authorHunter, R
dc.contributor.authorEwing, J
dc.date.accessioned2017-03-23T15:17:28Z
dc.date.issued2017-04-27
dc.description.abstractWe used Discourse Analysis to study how mediators and parties negotiate competing priorities and values during the family mediation process. We drew on understandings of practical morality, and specifically the concept of a moral order, to study UK mediation session talk. Our analysis highlighted the contradictory moral orders drawn on by parties and mediators. The saliency of moral categories and concerns in parenting is demonstrated, and we consider the problems this causes in the “no fault” context of mediation.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipThis work was supported by the Economic and Social Research Council [grant number ES/I031812/1]en_GB
dc.identifier.citationFirst published: 27 April 2017
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/crq.21195
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/26761
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherWiley for Association for Conflict Resolutionen_GB
dc.rights.embargoreasonPublisher's policy.en_GB
dc.subjectFamily Mediationen_GB
dc.subjectDiscourse Analysisen_GB
dc.subjectMoral Orderen_GB
dc.titleThe moral order in family mediation: negotiating competing valuesen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.identifier.issn0739-4098
dc.descriptionThis is the author accepted manuscript. The final version is available from Wiley via the DOI in this record.
dc.identifier.journalConflict Resolution Quarterlyen_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record