dc.contributor.author | Synge, M | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2017-05-31T14:39:17Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2012-07 | |
dc.description.abstract | This note provides a critical analysis of the Upper Tribunal's decision and questions its proposed application and legal justification. The author suggests that the Upper Tribunal has introduced a third sense of public benefit and that this relies upon a circular rationale which is informed by policy rather than law. | en_GB |
dc.identifier.citation | Vol. 75 (4), pp. 624 - 639 | en_GB |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1111/j.1468-2230.2012.00917.x | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10871/27747 | |
dc.language.iso | en | en_GB |
dc.publisher | Wiley for Modern Law Review | en_GB |
dc.title | Independent Schools Council v Charity Commission for England and Wales [2011] UKUT 421 (TCC) | en_GB |
dc.type | Article | en_GB |
dc.date.available | 2017-05-31T14:39:17Z | |
dc.identifier.issn | 0026-7961 | |
dc.description | This is the author accepted manuscript. The final version is available from Wiley via the DOI in this record. | en_GB |
dc.identifier.journal | Modern Law Review | en_GB |