| dc.contributor.author | Synge, M | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2017-05-31T14:52:55Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2011-11-17 | |
| dc.description.abstract | In 1951, an argument that schools should be charitable only if they offer free or reduced tuition was dismissed by the court as a “startling proposition”.1 Yet, in 2010, an independent school was assured of its charitable status only when it agreed to offer means-tested bursaries.2 So did the law change with the Charities Act 2006 (‘the Act’)? | en_GB |
| dc.identifier.citation | Vol. 70 (3), pp. 649 - 668 | en_GB |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1017/S0008197311000894 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10871/27748 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | en_GB |
| dc.publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) for University of Cambridge, Faculty of Law | en_GB |
| dc.title | Poverty: an essential element in charity after all? | en_GB |
| dc.type | Article | en_GB |
| dc.date.available | 2017-05-31T14:52:55Z | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 0008-1973 | |
| dc.description | This is the author accepted manuscript. The final version is available from CUP via the DOI in this record. | en_GB |
| dc.identifier.journal | Cambridge Law Journal | en_GB |
