| dc.contributor.author | Synge, MK | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2017-05-31T15:11:19Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2016-04 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Examines the Chancery Division judgment in Re Duffy (Deceased) on whether a legacy for the benefit of the residents at a care home, which amounted to 33 persons at the time of the testator's death, qualified as a charitable trust as it met the test of not being "numerically negligible" put forward by the House of Lords in Oppenheim v Tobacco Securities Trust Co Ltd to gloss the requirement of benefit to a "sufficient section of the public". | en_GB |
| dc.identifier.citation | Vol. 132, pp. 303 - 317 | en_GB |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10871/27750 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | en_GB |
| dc.publisher | Sweet and Maxwell | en_GB |
| dc.subject | Charitable purposes | en_GB |
| dc.subject | Charitable trusts | en_GB |
| dc.subject | Legacies | en_GB |
| dc.subject | Public benefit | en_GB |
| dc.title | Charitable status: not a negligible matter | en_GB |
| dc.type | Article | en_GB |
| dc.date.available | 2017-05-31T15:11:19Z | |
| dc.description | This is the author accepted manuscript. The definitive published version L.Q.R. 2016, 132(Apr), 303-317 is available online on Westlaw UK | en_GB |
| dc.identifier.journal | Law Quarterly Review | en_GB |
