Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorCornwall, SM
dc.date.accessioned2017-06-09T09:30:25Z
dc.date.issued2017-06-19
dc.description.abstractThis essay examines tropes of hiddenness and domestication in queer theology, particularly in light of the increasing mainstreaming of queer theologies in institutional (e.g. university, seminary, church) settings, and the inclusion of queer theologies by straight academics and teachers on their syllabi. Drawing on James C. Scott’s work on revolution as a luxury of the elite (by way of the Arab Spring, the UK riots of 2011, and the US demonstrations in 2014), and Judith Halberstam’s construction of “failure” as a strategy of queer resistance, I ask whether there will continue to be a role for “shadow queernesses” which reject institutional acceptability. However, I also suggest that the increased visibility of queer theology within mainstream institutions does not inevitably imply compromise or “toothlessness”, but may in fact testify to the pre-existing presence of queer diversity in multiple contexts and the inhabitation by queer scholars of various “homes”.en_GB
dc.identifier.citationPublished online: 19 Jun 2017
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/13558358.2017.1341207
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/27901
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherEquinox Publishing / Centre for the Study of Christianity and Sexualityen_GB
dc.rights.embargoreasonPublisher's policy.en_GB
dc.titleHome and Hiddenness: Queer Theology, Domestication and Institutionsen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.identifier.issn1355-8358
dc.descriptionArticleen_GB
dc.descriptionThis is the author accepted manuscript. The final version is available from Equinox Publishing via the DOI in this record.
dc.identifier.journalTheology and Sexualityen_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record