Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorTollerton, DC
dc.date.accessioned2017-07-03T08:16:04Z
dc.date.issued2018-10-26
dc.description.abstractResponding to Zachary Braiterman and Daniel Garner’s ideas on post-Holocaust religious thought, the author proposes a new model of relationships between theodicy and antitheodicy in which divine perfection is no longer privileged as the single key factor. Building from Peter Berger and Glifford Geertz’ treatments of the problem of evil, it is suggested that focus on meaning-making and tradition can result in a stratified view of theodicy-antitheodicy more able to engage with the dynamics of several well-known thinkers associated with religious response to the Holocaust.en_GB
dc.identifier.citationVol. 26 (2), pp. 278-292.en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.1163/1477285X-12341235
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/28274
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherBrill Academic Publishersen_GB
dc.rights© Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, 2018.
dc.subjectHolocausten_GB
dc.subjecttheodicyen_GB
dc.subjectantitheodicyen_GB
dc.titleReconfiguring the theodicy-antitheodicy boundary among responses to the Holocausten_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.identifier.issn1053-699X
dc.descriptionThis is the author accepted manuscript. The final version is available from Brill via the DOI in this record.en_GB
dc.identifier.eissn1477-285X
dc.identifier.journalJournal of Jewish Thought and Philosophyen_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record